RisingTransfers

Jason Kerr vs Casper Widell

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Jason Kerr leads in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Casper Widell is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, Jason Kerr holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Jason Kerr

Defender
Scotland
€700K
29 years old
Aerial
Full profile →
Player B

Casper Widell

Defender
Sweden
N/A
23 years old
Aerial
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Jason Kerr

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (9.3 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (74% duel success), dominant in the air (3.9 aerials won/90, 68%) and uses long balls frequently (5.8/90).

Casper Widell

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (7.3 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success), dominant in the air (3.2 aerials won/90, 63%) and uses long balls frequently (8.2/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricJason KerrCasper WidellEdge
Goals / 900.060.03
Tackles won / 900.870.74Jason
Interceptions / 901.130.97Jason
Clearances / 909.387.29Jason
Press intensity / 901.941.66Jason
Pass accuracy %80.4083.10Casper

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Jason Kerr or Casper Widell?

Jason Kerr leads in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Casper Widell is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, Jason Kerr holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Jason Kerr has a market value of €700K, while Casper Widell is valued at N/A.

Explore More