James Justin vs Matty Cash
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Matty Cash commands a higher market value (€22.0M vs €12.0M). James Justin leads in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Matty Cash is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, James Justin holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Defender. Statistically, he stands out as comfortable with both feet, active in the tackle (2.5 tackles/90), commanding in the air (4.4 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (60% duel success) and active off the ball (2.2 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.0 tackles/90) and meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | James Justin | Matty Cash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.10 | 0.09 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.53 | 0.80 | James |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.36 | 0.69 | James |
| Clearances / 90 | 4.40 | 2.52 | James |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.25 | 1.52 | James |
| Pass accuracy % | 76.80 | 85.80 | Matty |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — James Justin or Matty Cash?
Matty Cash commands a higher market value (€22.0M vs €12.0M). James Justin leads in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Matty Cash is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, James Justin holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
James Justin has a market value of €12.0M, while Matty Cash is valued at €22.0M.