Jordan Kadiri vs Ally Samatta
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Ally Samatta commands a higher market value (€6.0M vs €1.2M). Jordan Kadiri leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Ally Samatta is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Jordan Kadiri holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a constant goal threat (2.7 shots/90), a regular goalscorer (0.25 goals/90), strong in aerial duels (3.4 aerials won/90) and draws fouls effectively (3.8/90).
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90) and a constant goal threat (2.7 shots/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Jordan Kadiri | Ally Samatta | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.35 | 0.00 | Jordan |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 3.82 | 2.29 | Jordan |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.39 | 0.29 | Jordan |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 1.64 | 1.17 | Jordan |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.41 | 0.27 | Jordan |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.00 | 0.92 | Ally |
| Pass accuracy % | 75.00 | 71.90 | Jordan |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Jordan Kadiri or Ally Samatta?
Ally Samatta commands a higher market value (€6.0M vs €1.2M). Jordan Kadiri leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Ally Samatta is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Jordan Kadiri holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Jordan Kadiri has a market value of €1.2M, while Ally Samatta is valued at €6.0M.