RisingTransfers

Nigel Thomas vs Martín Merquelanz

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Nigel Thomas leads in goals / 90 and key passes / 90. Martín Merquelanz is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Martín Merquelanz holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Nigel Thomas

Attacker
Curaçao
N/A
25 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →
Player B

Martín Merquelanz

Attacker
Spain
N/A
30 years old
Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Nigel Thomas

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.8 key passes/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (1.47 big chances/90).

Martín Merquelanz

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.5 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.17 assists/90), wins the physical battle (57% duel success) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.50 big chances/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricNigel ThomasMartín MerquelanzEdge
Goals / 900.160.00Nigel
Assists / 900.000.17Martín
Shots / 900.781.83Martín
Key passes / 901.761.50Nigel
Press intensity / 900.120.17Martín
Pass accuracy %69.0078.90Martín

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Nigel Thomas or Martín Merquelanz?

Nigel Thomas leads in goals / 90 and key passes / 90. Martín Merquelanz is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Martín Merquelanz holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Nigel Thomas has a market value of N/A, while Martín Merquelanz is valued at N/A.

Explore More