Igor Dmitriev vs Anis Hadj Moussa
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Anis Hadj Moussa commands a higher market value (€20.0M vs €2.5M). Anis Hadj Moussa is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Anis Hadj Moussa holds the statistical edge across 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a reliable supplier (0.15 assists/90).
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as naturally left-footed, an elite creator (2.4 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (2.7 shots/90), a regular goalscorer (0.33 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.22 assists/90), a dynamic dribbler (2.7/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.58 big chances/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Igor Dmitriev | Anis Hadj Moussa | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.12 | 0.33 | Anis |
| Assists / 90 | 0.25 | 0.22 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 1.12 | 2.67 | Anis |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.74 | 2.37 | Anis |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 0.00 | 3.44 | Anis |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.00 | 0.49 | Anis |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.20 | 2.10 | Anis |
| Pass accuracy % | — | 73.30 | — |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Igor Dmitriev or Anis Hadj Moussa?
Anis Hadj Moussa commands a higher market value (€20.0M vs €2.5M). Anis Hadj Moussa is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Anis Hadj Moussa holds the statistical edge across 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Igor Dmitriev has a market value of €2.5M, while Anis Hadj Moussa is valued at €20.0M.