Heung-min Son vs Gustavo Silva
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Heung-min Son leads in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Gustavo Silva is stronger in goals / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (2.5 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.1 shots/90), a prolific assist provider (0.92 assists/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.92 big chances/90).
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.5 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.3 shots/90) and a regular goalscorer (0.36 goals/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Heung-min Son | Gustavo Silva | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.34 | Gustavo |
| Assists / 90 | 0.92 | 0.14 | Heung-min |
| Shots / 90 | 3.15 | 3.17 | — |
| Key passes / 90 | 2.50 | 1.45 | Heung-min |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | — | 2.42 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 1.16 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.00 | 1.69 | Gustavo |
| Pass accuracy % | 88.60 | 66.10 | Heung-min |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Heung-min Son or Gustavo Silva?
Heung-min Son leads in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Gustavo Silva is stronger in goals / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Heung-min Son has a market value of N/A, while Gustavo Silva is valued at N/A.