Club PK
Pisa vs Fulham
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Profiles are close on minutes and market value — no clear profile edge.
Recent output is balanced — form does not separate them cleanly.
Loyola has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Reed still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Loyola
Preview · read-only
Loyola
Market value (€)
Reed
Loyola
Season goals
Reed
Loyola
Goals / 90
Reed
Loyola edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 6.39 |
| 7.33 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.34 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 1.50 | 0.68 |
| DNA & style | Key passes · league rank | Beats 24% | Top 9% |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Top 46% | Beats 0% |
| DNA & style | Interceptions · league rank | Top 19% | Top 39% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
