RisingTransfers

Hayate Matsuda vs Elias Caspersen Egerton

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Hayate Matsuda leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Elias Caspersen Egerton is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Elias Caspersen Egerton holds the statistical edge across 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Hayate Matsuda

Midfielder
Japan
N/A
22 years old
Balanced Midfielder
Full profile →
Player B

Elias Caspersen Egerton

Midfielder
Norway
N/A
22 years old
Creator
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Hayate Matsuda

A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a regular goalscorer (0.20 goals/90), heavily involved in play (54 touches/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.1/90).

Elias Caspersen Egerton

A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricHayate MatsudaElias Caspersen EgertonEdge
Goals / 900.210.00Hayate
Assists / 900.000.13Elias
Shots / 901.971.56Hayate
Key passes / 900.410.78Elias
Interceptions / 900.410.52Elias
Press intensity / 901.481.59Elias
Pass accuracy %71.4087.30Elias

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Hayate Matsuda or Elias Caspersen Egerton?

Hayate Matsuda leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Elias Caspersen Egerton is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Elias Caspersen Egerton holds the statistical edge across 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Hayate Matsuda has a market value of N/A, while Elias Caspersen Egerton is valued at N/A.

Explore More