Gonçalo Borges vs Gustavo Silva
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Gonçalo Borges leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Gustavo Silva is stronger in shots / 90 and pass accuracy %. Overall, Gonçalo Borges holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (2.0 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (2.8 shots/90), a proven goalscorer (0.40 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.20 assists/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.60 big chances/90).
A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.5 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.3 shots/90) and a regular goalscorer (0.36 goals/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Gonçalo Borges | Gustavo Silva | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.40 | 0.34 | Gonçalo |
| Assists / 90 | 0.20 | 0.14 | Gonçalo |
| Shots / 90 | 2.79 | 3.17 | Gustavo |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.99 | 1.45 | Gonçalo |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | — | 2.42 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 1.16 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.14 | 1.69 | Gonçalo |
| Pass accuracy % | 63.00 | 66.10 | Gustavo |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Gonçalo Borges or Gustavo Silva?
Gonçalo Borges leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Gustavo Silva is stronger in shots / 90 and pass accuracy %. Overall, Gonçalo Borges holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Gonçalo Borges has a market value of €4.0M, while Gustavo Silva is valued at N/A.