Fisnik Isaki vs Noah Naujoks
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Fisnik Isaki leads in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Noah Naujoks is stronger in shots / 90 and interceptions / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.24 goals/90), a dynamic dribbler (2.3/90), meticulous in distribution (89% pass accuracy) and heavily involved in play (53 touches/90).
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.36 goals/90) and active in the tackle (2.0 tackles/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Fisnik Isaki | Noah Naujoks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.32 | 0.36 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.11 | 0.04 | Fisnik |
| Shots / 90 | 2.24 | 2.48 | Noah |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.17 | 1.04 | Fisnik |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | — | 4.07 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 0.98 | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.64 | 0.84 | Noah |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.63 | 1.74 | Noah |
| Pass accuracy % | 85.70 | 68.90 | Fisnik |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Fisnik Isaki or Noah Naujoks?
Fisnik Isaki leads in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Noah Naujoks is stronger in shots / 90 and interceptions / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Fisnik Isaki has a market value of N/A, while Noah Naujoks is valued at N/A.