Club PK
Willem II vs Telstar
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 51–49 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Offerhaus has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Recent output is balanced — form does not separate them cleanly.
Stam has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Offerhaus still answers in theirs.
Stam edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Pick
I'm backing Stam
Preview · read-only
Stam
Season goals
Offerhaus
Stam
Goals / 90
Offerhaus
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 5.08 |
| 4.33 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 58.26 | 39.88 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | — | 0.56 |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 2.36 | 1.00 |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 8% | Top 37% |
| DNA & style | Aerials · league rank | Top 17% | Beats 37% |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Beats 10% | Beats 49% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
