Club PK
Queens Park Rangers vs Willem II
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 51–49 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Kemper has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Recent output is balanced — form does not separate them cleanly.
Stam has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Kemper still answers in theirs.
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Pick
I'm backing Kemper
Preview · read-only
Kemper
Season goals
Stam
Kemper
Goals / 90
Stam
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 2.89 |
| 5.08 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 35.90 | 58.26 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | 0.83 | — |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 0.78 | 2.36 |
| DNA & style | clearances · league rank | Beats 30% | Top 16% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Top 44% | Beats 8% |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Top 50% | Beats 10% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
