Fabian Rüth vs Dayot Upamecano
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Fabian Rüth leads in goals / 90. Dayot Upamecano is stronger in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Overall, Dayot Upamecano holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Defender. Note: this profile is based on 540 minutes of playing time this season.
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90), meticulous in distribution (93% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (58% duel success), heavily involved in possession (82 passes/90), penetrates with forward passing (9.7 final-third passes/90), central to possession (94 touches/90), uses long balls frequently (5.3/90) and a high-intensity presser (press score 3.1/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Fabian Rüth | Dayot Upamecano | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.17 | 0.05 | Fabian |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 1.35 | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.00 | 1.00 | Dayot |
| Clearances / 90 | 0.00 | 2.60 | Dayot |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.00 | 3.07 | Dayot |
| Pass accuracy % | — | 92.60 | — |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Fabian Rüth or Dayot Upamecano?
Fabian Rüth leads in goals / 90. Dayot Upamecano is stronger in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Overall, Dayot Upamecano holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Fabian Rüth has a market value of N/A, while Dayot Upamecano is valued at €70.0M.