Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso vs Andreas Smed
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso leads in key passes / 90 and pass accuracy %. Andreas Smed is stronger in shots / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso
Playing Style Profiles
A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90) and a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90).
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90) and a prolific assist provider (0.31 assists/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso | Andreas Smed | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.05 | 0.08 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.19 | 0.23 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 0.33 | 1.86 | Andreas |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.23 | 1.01 | Francisco |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 3.02 | — | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.52 | — | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.93 | 1.90 | — |
| Pass accuracy % | 78.10 | 71.80 | Francisco |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso or Andreas Smed?
Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso leads in key passes / 90 and pass accuracy %. Andreas Smed is stronger in shots / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso has a market value of N/A, while Andreas Smed is valued at N/A.