Club PK
Kocaelispor vs Eyüpspor
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Prince Ampem edges this comparison 34–66 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict.
Ampem has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Ampem carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Ampem has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Gedik still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Gedik
Preview · read-only
Gedik
Season goals
Ampem
Gedik
Goals / 90
Ampem
Ampem edges the DNA round on style percentiles and archetype tags.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 6.77 |
| 6.73 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.54 | 0.28 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 1.63 | 2.68 |
| DNA & style | Key passes · league rank | Beats 3% | Top 39% |
| DNA & style | Tackles · league rank | Top 10% | Beats 34% |
| DNA & style | Shots · league rank | Beats 27% | Top 24% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
