Emanuele Valeri vs Marco Palestra
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Marco Palestra commands a higher market value (€25.0M vs €3.0M). Emanuele Valeri leads in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Marco Palestra is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, Emanuele Valeri holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as naturally left-footed, an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Active Full-Back. Statistically, he stands out as a dynamic dribbler (2.1/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success) and draws fouls effectively (3.2/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Emanuele Valeri | Marco Palestra | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.16 | 0.97 | Emanuele |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.01 | 0.57 | Emanuele |
| Clearances / 90 | 1.84 | 1.19 | Emanuele |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.11 | 1.82 | Emanuele |
| Pass accuracy % | 71.70 | 85.40 | Marco |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Emanuele Valeri or Marco Palestra?
Marco Palestra commands a higher market value (€25.0M vs €3.0M). Emanuele Valeri leads in tackles won / 90 and interceptions / 90. Marco Palestra is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, Emanuele Valeri holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Emanuele Valeri has a market value of €3.0M, while Marco Palestra is valued at €25.0M.