Ewerton Paixão da Silva vs Pedro Neto
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Pedro Neto commands a higher market value (€60.0M vs €2.4M). Ewerton Paixão da Silva leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Pedro Neto is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Ewerton Paixão da Silva holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a regular goalscorer (0.24 goals/90).
A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as naturally left-footed, an elite creator (1.8 key passes/90) and meticulous in distribution (87% pass accuracy).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Ewerton Paixão da Silva | Pedro Neto | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.24 | 0.18 | Ewerton |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.14 | Pedro |
| Shots / 90 | 2.08 | 1.59 | Ewerton |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.85 | 1.81 | Pedro |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 3.31 | 1.80 | Ewerton |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.64 | 0.38 | Ewerton |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.60 | 1.31 | Ewerton |
| Pass accuracy % | 100.00 | 87.50 | Ewerton |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Ewerton Paixão da Silva or Pedro Neto?
Pedro Neto commands a higher market value (€60.0M vs €2.4M). Ewerton Paixão da Silva leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Pedro Neto is stronger in assists / 90 and key passes / 90. Overall, Ewerton Paixão da Silva holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Ewerton Paixão da Silva has a market value of €2.4M, while Pedro Neto is valued at €60.0M.