RisingTransfers

Emil Forsberg vs Marco Matias

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Emil Forsberg leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Marco Matias is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Emil Forsberg holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Emil Forsberg

Attacker
Sweden
€3.0M
34 years old
Creative
Full profile →
Player B

Marco Matias

Attacker
Portugal
N/A
37 years old
Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Emil Forsberg

Emil Forsberg is a Creator. Playmaker unlocking defenses with key passes.

Marco Matias

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90), a regular goalscorer (0.21 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.21 assists/90), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (1.00 big chances/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.9/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricEmil ForsbergMarco MatiasEdge
Goals / 900.100.21Marco
Assists / 900.200.21
Shots / 902.231.00Emil
Key passes / 902.131.64Emil
Passes (final 3rd) / 903.50
Tackles won / 901.50
Interceptions / 900.411.00Marco
Press intensity / 902.071.88Emil
Pass accuracy %86.7072.70Emil

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Emil Forsberg or Marco Matias?

Emil Forsberg leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Marco Matias is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Emil Forsberg holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Emil Forsberg has a market value of €3.0M, while Marco Matias is valued at N/A.

Explore More