RisingTransfers

Elias Egouli vs Jerome Opoku

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Elias Egouli leads in clearances / 90. Jerome Opoku is stronger in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. Overall, Jerome Opoku holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Elias Egouli

Defender
Germany
N/A
23 years old
Ball-Playing CB
Full profile →
Player B

Jerome Opoku

Defender
Ghana
N/A
27 years old
Aerial
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Elias Egouli

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (7.9 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (89% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (57% duel success) and dominant in the air (3.4 aerials won/90, 61%).

Jerome Opoku

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.1 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (90% pass accuracy) and wins the physical battle (61% duel success).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricElias EgouliJerome OpokuEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Tackles won / 900.58
Interceptions / 900.981.26Jerome
Clearances / 908.544.11Elias
Press intensity / 901.751.89Jerome
Pass accuracy %88.1089.60Jerome

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Elias Egouli or Jerome Opoku?

Elias Egouli leads in clearances / 90. Jerome Opoku is stronger in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. Overall, Jerome Opoku holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Elias Egouli has a market value of N/A, while Jerome Opoku is valued at N/A.

Explore More