Club PK
FC Utrecht vs Sparta Rotterdam
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Shunsuke Mito edges this comparison 43–57 on RT data — a tendency, not an absolute "better player" verdict.
Mito has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Mito carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Mito has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Demircan still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Demircan
Preview · read-only
Demircan
Season goals
Mito
Demircan
Goals / 90
Mito
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Season rating |
| 7.07 |
| 7.03 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.51 | 0.34 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.25 | 0.14 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 2.16 | 2.50 |
| DNA & style | Interceptions · league rank | Beats 36% | Top 21% |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Top 24% | Beats 36% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Beats 34% | Top 39% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.