Đorđe Denić vs Alan de Souza Guimarães
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Đorđe Denić leads in key passes / 90 and tackles won / 90. Alan de Souza Guimarães is stronger in shots / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.5 key passes/90) and a reliable supplier (0.15 assists/90).
A Creator. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.4 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.18 assists/90), meticulous in distribution (89% pass accuracy) and heavily involved in play (53 touches/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Đorđe Denić | Alan de Souza Guimarães | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.13 | 0.17 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.16 | 0.17 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 1.19 | 1.25 | Alan |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.51 | 1.43 | Đorđe |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 2.72 | 5.93 | Alan |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.88 | 0.45 | Đorđe |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.69 | 0.21 | Đorđe |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.73 | 1.36 | Đorđe |
| Pass accuracy % | 77.00 | 86.20 | Alan |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Đorđe Denić or Alan de Souza Guimarães?
Đorđe Denić leads in key passes / 90 and tackles won / 90. Alan de Souza Guimarães is stronger in shots / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Đorđe Denić has a market value of €100K, while Alan de Souza Guimarães is valued at N/A.