David Lischka vs Tijn Joosten
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
David Lischka leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Tijn Joosten is stronger in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as a regular goalscorer (0.33 goals/90), commanding in the air (6.7 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (66% duel success), strong in aerial duels (3.2 aerials won/90) and uses long balls frequently (5.1/90).
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.3 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (60% duel success), uses long balls frequently (7.1/90) and active off the ball (2.6 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | David Lischka | Tijn Joosten | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.33 | 0.00 | David |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.60 | 1.04 | David |
| Clearances / 90 | 3.84 | 4.87 | Tijn |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.86 | 2.56 | Tijn |
| Pass accuracy % | 78.70 | 84.60 | Tijn |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — David Lischka or Tijn Joosten?
David Lischka leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Tijn Joosten is stronger in clearances / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
David Lischka has a market value of €625K, while Tijn Joosten is valued at N/A.