RisingTransfers

Damian van Bruggen vs Luís Rocha

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Damian van Bruggen leads in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Luís Rocha is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Damian van Bruggen holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Damian van Bruggen

Defender
Netherlands
N/A
30 years old
Aerial
Full profile →
Player B

Luís Rocha

Defender
Portugal
N/A
39 years old
Aerial
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Damian van Bruggen

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.6 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (87% pass accuracy) and switches play with precision (9.9 long balls/90, 63% accuracy).

Luís Rocha

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.4 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy) and uses long balls frequently (7.3/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricDamian van BruggenLuís RochaEdge
Goals / 900.040.00
Tackles won / 900.46
Interceptions / 901.110.77Damian
Clearances / 905.704.38Damian
Press intensity / 900.961.55Luís
Pass accuracy %87.4086.40Damian

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Damian van Bruggen or Luís Rocha?

Damian van Bruggen leads in interceptions / 90 and clearances / 90. Luís Rocha is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Damian van Bruggen holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Damian van Bruggen has a market value of N/A, while Luís Rocha is valued at N/A.

Explore More