Club PK
New England vs PEC Zwolle
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 52–48 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Buitink has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Buitink carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Turgeman has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Buitink still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Turgeman
Preview · read-only
Turgeman
Market value (€)
Buitink
Turgeman
Season goals
Buitink
Turgeman
Goals / 90
Buitink
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| — |
| 6.74 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.22 | 0.19 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.32 | 0.57 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 2.26 | 1.70 |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Beats 43% | Top 1% |
| DNA & style | Shots · league rank | Top 45% | Beats 5% |
| DNA & style | Key passes · league rank | Beats 16% | Top 47% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
