Declan John vs Nicholas Mickelson
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Declan John leads in press intensity / 90. Nicholas Mickelson is stronger in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Defender. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.7 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.57 big chances/90).
A Solid Defender. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.7 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.22 assists/90), meticulous in distribution (86% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (57% duel success), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.78 big chances/90) and delivers dangerous crosses (2.7 accurate crosses/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Declan John | Nicholas Mickelson | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.04 | 0.00 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.72 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.53 | 1.76 | Nicholas |
| Clearances / 90 | 2.04 | 2.05 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.62 | 1.14 | Declan |
| Pass accuracy % | 77.40 | 87.30 | Nicholas |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Declan John or Nicholas Mickelson?
Declan John leads in press intensity / 90. Nicholas Mickelson is stronger in interceptions / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Declan John has a market value of €890K, while Nicholas Mickelson is valued at N/A.