Diego Coppola vs Paul Scholl
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Diego Coppola leads in clearances / 90. Paul Scholl is stronger in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. Overall, Paul Scholl holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as a reliable supplier (0.22 assists/90), commanding in the air (7.8 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (57% duel success) and uses long balls frequently (6.8/90).
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as a reliable supplier (0.16 assists/90), commanding in the air (5.5 clearances/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.6 interceptions/90), meticulous in distribution (89% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (58% duel success), central to possession (70 touches/90) and uses long balls frequently (5.0/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Diego Coppola | Paul Scholl | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.20 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.67 | 1.70 | Paul |
| Clearances / 90 | 8.33 | 4.60 | Diego |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.60 | 1.68 | Paul |
| Pass accuracy % | 84.10 | 93.90 | Paul |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Diego Coppola or Paul Scholl?
Diego Coppola leads in clearances / 90. Paul Scholl is stronger in interceptions / 90 and press intensity / 90. Overall, Paul Scholl holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Diego Coppola has a market value of €11.0M, while Paul Scholl is valued at N/A.