David Brekalo vs Nermin Zolotić
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
David Brekalo leads in shots / 90 and tackles won / 90. Nermin Zolotić is stronger in passes (final 3rd) / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, David Brekalo holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (4.4 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (89% pass accuracy) and wins the physical battle (55% duel success).
A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.1 tackles/90), wins the physical battle (71% duel success) and uses long balls frequently (7.2/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | David Brekalo | Nermin Zolotić | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 0.50 | 0.00 | David |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 2.50 | 4.92 | Nermin |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.00 | 0.00 | David |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.50 | 1.97 | Nermin |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.80 | 0.25 | David |
| Pass accuracy % | 89.20 | 86.90 | David |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — David Brekalo or Nermin Zolotić?
David Brekalo leads in shots / 90 and tackles won / 90. Nermin Zolotić is stronger in passes (final 3rd) / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, David Brekalo holds the statistical edge across 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
David Brekalo has a market value of €2.6M, while Nermin Zolotić is valued at N/A.