RisingTransfers

Danny Bakker vs Jacob Vetter

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Danny Bakker leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Jacob Vetter is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Danny Bakker holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Danny Bakker

Defender
Netherlands
N/A
31 years old
Aerial
Full profile →
Player B

Jacob Vetter

Defender
Denmark
N/A
27 years old
Aerial
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Danny Bakker

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (6.0 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (56% duel success), strong in aerial duels (3.2 aerials won/90) and uses long balls frequently (5.8/90).

Jacob Vetter

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (6.2 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (61% duel success), central to possession (70 touches/90) and uses long balls frequently (10.8/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricDanny BakkerJacob VetterEdge
Goals / 900.110.00Danny
Tackles won / 900.81
Interceptions / 900.920.77Danny
Clearances / 906.015.65Danny
Press intensity / 901.811.91Jacob
Pass accuracy %87.4080.50Danny

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Danny Bakker or Jacob Vetter?

Danny Bakker leads in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Jacob Vetter is stronger in press intensity / 90. Overall, Danny Bakker holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Danny Bakker has a market value of N/A, while Jacob Vetter is valued at N/A.

Explore More