RisingTransfers

Cihat Çelik vs Younes Bakiz

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Cihat Çelik leads in key passes / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. Younes Bakiz is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Cihat Çelik holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Cihat Çelik

Midfielder
Netherlands
N/A
30 years old
Balanced Midfielder
Full profile →
Player B

Younes Bakiz

Midfielder
Denmark
N/A
27 years old
Box-to-Box
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Cihat Çelik

Yusuf Cihat Çelik is a Balanced Midfielder. Well-rounded midfielder contributing in multiple phases.

Younes Bakiz

A Box-to-Box. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.3 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90), heavily involved in play (56 touches/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.2/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricCihat ÇelikYounes BakizEdge
Goals / 900.100.22Younes
Assists / 900.070.11
Shots / 901.302.64Younes
Key passes / 901.161.10Cihat
Passes (final 3rd) / 908.303.27Cihat
Tackles won / 901.200.73Cihat
Interceptions / 900.770.55Cihat
Press intensity / 903.011.59Cihat
Pass accuracy %81.3076.50Cihat

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Cihat Çelik or Younes Bakiz?

Cihat Çelik leads in key passes / 90 and passes (final 3rd) / 90. Younes Bakiz is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Cihat Çelik holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Cihat Çelik has a market value of N/A, while Younes Bakiz is valued at N/A.

Explore More