RisingTransfers

Cedric Wilfried Teguia Noubi vs Bilal Ould-Chikh

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Cedric Wilfried Teguia Noubi leads in press intensity / 90. Bilal Ould-Chikh is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Bilal Ould-Chikh holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Cedric Wilfried Teguia Noubi

Attacker
Spain
N/A
24 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →
Player B

Bilal Ould-Chikh

Attacker
Netherlands
N/A
28 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Cedric Wilfried Teguia Noubi

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90).

Bilal Ould-Chikh

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.9 key passes/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.55 big chances/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricCedric Wilfried Teguia NoubiBilal Ould-ChikhEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Assists / 900.000.11Bilal
Shots / 901.041.42Bilal
Key passes / 901.241.85Bilal
Passes (final 3rd) / 904.34
Tackles won / 900.60
Press intensity / 902.051.19Cedric
Pass accuracy %70.3078.90Bilal

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Cedric Wilfried Teguia Noubi or Bilal Ould-Chikh?

Cedric Wilfried Teguia Noubi leads in press intensity / 90. Bilal Ould-Chikh is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Bilal Ould-Chikh holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Cedric Wilfried Teguia Noubi has a market value of N/A, while Bilal Ould-Chikh is valued at N/A.

Explore More