Carlos Rotondi vs Lenny Pintor
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Lenny Pintor commands a higher market value (€5.0M vs €3.9M). Carlos Rotondi leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Lenny Pintor is stronger in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. Overall, Carlos Rotondi holds the statistical edge across 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.8 key passes/90) and a reliable supplier (0.22 assists/90).
A Dynamic Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90), a dynamic dribbler (2.2/90) and draws fouls effectively (3.4/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Carlos Rotondi | Lenny Pintor | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.16 | 0.00 | Carlos |
| Assists / 90 | 0.23 | 0.00 | Carlos |
| Shots / 90 | 2.13 | 1.46 | Carlos |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.80 | 1.58 | Carlos |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 4.42 | 1.43 | Carlos |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.40 | 1.43 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.12 | 2.95 | Lenny |
| Pass accuracy % | 72.50 | 78.10 | Lenny |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Carlos Rotondi or Lenny Pintor?
Lenny Pintor commands a higher market value (€5.0M vs €3.9M). Carlos Rotondi leads in goals / 90 and assists / 90. Lenny Pintor is stronger in press intensity / 90 and pass accuracy %. Overall, Carlos Rotondi holds the statistical edge across 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Carlos Rotondi has a market value of €3.9M, while Lenny Pintor is valued at €5.0M.