Christian Nørgaard vs Oliver Højer
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Christian Nørgaard leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Oliver Højer is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, Christian Nørgaard holds the statistical edge across 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Ball-Winner. Statistically, he stands out as an aggressive ball-winner (2.5 tackles/90), reads the game exceptionally (1.6 interceptions/90), wins the physical battle (55% duel success), heavily involved in play (60 touches/90) and a high-intensity presser (press score 3.4/90), constantly disrupting opposition build-up.
Oliver Højer is a Box-to-Box. Engine covering ground in attack and defense.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Christian Nørgaard | Oliver Højer | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.50 | 0.00 | Christian |
| Shots / 90 | 0.25 | 0.00 | Christian |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.75 | 0.94 | Christian |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 8.33 | — | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.33 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.00 | 0.00 | Christian |
| Press intensity / 90 | 3.35 | 0.00 | Christian |
| Pass accuracy % | 82.40 | 86.50 | Oliver |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Christian Nørgaard or Oliver Højer?
Christian Nørgaard leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Oliver Højer is stronger in pass accuracy %. Overall, Christian Nørgaard holds the statistical edge across 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Christian Nørgaard has a market value of €9.0M, while Oliver Højer is valued at N/A.