Club PK
Swansea City vs Fredericia
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 48–52 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Congreve has the stronger profile on minutes, rating, and market cues.
Congreve carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Simonsen has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Congreve still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Congreve
Preview · read-only
Congreve
Market value (€)
Simonsen
Congreve
Season goals
Simonsen
Congreve
Goals / 90
Simonsen
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 6.69 |
| 6.69 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.07 | 0.14 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.26 | 0.29 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 1.66 | 1.72 |
| DNA & style | Big chances · league rank | Top 17% | Beats 0% |
| DNA & style | Interceptions · league rank | Beats 2% | Top 33% |
| DNA & style | Tackles · league rank | Beats 7% | Beats 45% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
