Bismark Charles Kwarema vs Jason Ceka
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Bismark Charles Kwarema leads in goals / 90. Jason Ceka is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Jason Ceka holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a regular goalscorer (0.36 goals/90).
A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a regular goalscorer (0.24 goals/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.2/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Bismark Charles Kwarema | Jason Ceka | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.36 | 0.24 | Bismark |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.08 | Jason |
| Shots / 90 | 0.00 | 0.78 | Jason |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.00 | 0.78 | Jason |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.00 | 1.37 | Jason |
| Pass accuracy % | — | 72.90 | — |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Bismark Charles Kwarema or Jason Ceka?
Bismark Charles Kwarema leads in goals / 90. Jason Ceka is stronger in assists / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Jason Ceka holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Bismark Charles Kwarema has a market value of €100K, while Jason Ceka is valued at N/A.