Club PK
Bodø / Glimt vs Ulm
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 50–50 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Profiles are close on minutes and market value — no clear profile edge.
Mikkelsen carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Chessa has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Mikkelsen still answers in theirs.
Pick
I'm backing Mikkelsen
Preview · read-only
Mikkelsen
Market value (€)
Chessa
Mikkelsen
Season goals
Chessa
Mikkelsen
Goals / 90
Chessa
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| 7.05 |
| 6.79 |
| Per-90 comparison | Goals / 90 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
| Per-90 comparison | Assists / 90 | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| Per-90 comparison | Shots / 90 | 1.97 | 1.72 |
| DNA & style | Interceptions · league rank | Beats 0% | Top 7% |
| DNA & style | Tackles · league rank | Beats 8% | Top 5% |
| DNA & style | Ball recovery · league rank | Top 23% | Beats 5% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
