Andreas Smed vs Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Andreas Smed leads in shots / 90. Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso is stronger in key passes / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso
Playing Style Profiles
A Complete Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90) and a prolific assist provider (0.31 assists/90).
A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90) and a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Andreas Smed | Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.08 | 0.05 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.23 | 0.19 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 1.86 | 0.33 | Andreas |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.01 | 1.23 | Francisco |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | — | 3.02 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 0.52 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.90 | 1.93 | — |
| Pass accuracy % | 71.80 | 78.10 | Francisco |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Andreas Smed or Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso?
Andreas Smed leads in shots / 90. Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso is stronger in key passes / 90 and pass accuracy %. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Andreas Smed has a market value of N/A, while Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Tomé Tavares Bondoso is valued at N/A.