Álvaro González vs Pedro Lima
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Both players are valued similarly (€4.0M vs €4.0M). Álvaro González leads in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. Pedro Lima is stronger in interceptions / 90. Overall, Álvaro González holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
González operates as a high-volume orchestrator trapped in a Tier-C defensive shell, recording a massive 64.8 passes per 90 that places him in the top 5% of the Pro League for distribution volume. While his 84.4% accuracy suggests a reliable metronome, the data reveals a specialist in ground-level dominance, boasting a perfect 100% duel win rate that defies standard defensive regression.
A Defender. Statistically, he stands out as wins the physical battle (60% duel success).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Álvaro González | Pedro Lima | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.05 | 0.00 | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.89 | 1.78 | Pedro |
| Clearances / 90 | 3.14 | 1.78 | Álvaro |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.31 | 0.35 | — |
| Pass accuracy % | 84.40 | 79.60 | Álvaro |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Álvaro González or Pedro Lima?
Both players are valued similarly (€4.0M vs €4.0M). Álvaro González leads in goals / 90 and clearances / 90. Pedro Lima is stronger in interceptions / 90. Overall, Álvaro González holds the statistical edge across 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Álvaro González has a market value of €4.0M, while Pedro Lima is valued at €4.0M.