RisingTransfers

Adrian Mazilu vs David Larrubia

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Adrian Mazilu leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. David Larrubia is stronger in key passes / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Adrian Mazilu

Attacker
Romania
€400K
20 years old
Dribbler
Full profile →
Player B

David Larrubia

Attacker
Spain
N/A
24 years old
Inside Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Adrian Mazilu

A Dynamic Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.4 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.1 shots/90), a reliable supplier (0.20 assists/90) and a dynamic dribbler (3.0/90).

David Larrubia

A Inside Forward. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.5 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (2.5 shots/90), a regular goalscorer (0.27 goals/90) and a dynamic dribbler (3.0/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricAdrian MaziluDavid LarrubiaEdge
Goals / 900.100.07
Assists / 900.200.07Adrian
Shots / 904.082.36Adrian
Key passes / 900.581.52David
Press intensity / 900.073.16David
Pass accuracy %80.1082.60David

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Adrian Mazilu or David Larrubia?

Adrian Mazilu leads in assists / 90 and shots / 90. David Larrubia is stronger in key passes / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Adrian Mazilu has a market value of €400K, while David Larrubia is valued at N/A.

Explore More