Club PK
Go Ahead Eagles vs FC Volendam
Pick below to start
Head-to-head player comparison · per-90 stats & DNA
Pick once · vote each round
Round 1 · Basics
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 2 · Recent form
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 3 · Per-90 comparison
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 4 · DNA & style
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
Round 5 · Value fight
Use the Pick buttons in the arena card to start.
THE CALL: Split 53–47 — the statistics disagree across dimensions; neither player dominates every round.
Profiles are close on minutes and market value — no clear profile edge.
Sampsted carries sharper recent form — season and last-10 output tilt their way.
Sampsted has the sharper per-90 profile in their role; Payne still answers in theirs.
Style vectors overlap — DNA tags do not crown a single winner this round.
Pick
I'm backing Sampsted
Preview · read-only
Sampsted
Season goals
Payne
Sampsted
Goals / 90
Payne
Market value and efficiency metrics land in a draw band.
| Clearances / 90 |
| 4.30 |
| 2.22 |
| Per-90 comparison | Passes / 90 | 32.25 | 31.51 |
| Per-90 comparison | Tackles won / 90 | — | 2.41 |
| Per-90 comparison | Interceptions / 90 | 0.82 | 0.77 |
| DNA & style | Dribbles past · league rank | Beats 5% | Top 40% |
| DNA & style | Aerials · league rank | Top 38% | Beats 8% |
| DNA & style | Press · league rank | Beats 34% | Top 27% |
Per-90 and seasonal stats from RT data. Use the interactive PK above for all five rounds.
