Adam Markhiev vs Mathis Amougou
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Mathis Amougou commands a higher market value (€10.0M vs €2.5M). Adam Markhiev leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Mathis Amougou is stronger in passes (final 3rd) / 90 and tackles won / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
Adam Marhiev is a Balanced Midfielder. Well-rounded midfielder contributing in multiple phases.
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as active in the tackle (2.2 tackles/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.52 big chances/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Adam Markhiev | Mathis Amougou | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 1.04 | 0.50 | Adam |
| Key passes / 90 | 0.60 | 0.50 | Adam |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 0.41 | 5.03 | Mathis |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.41 | 0.75 | Mathis |
| Interceptions / 90 | 1.34 | 0.25 | Adam |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.82 | 0.89 | Mathis |
| Pass accuracy % | — | 79.70 | — |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Adam Markhiev or Mathis Amougou?
Mathis Amougou commands a higher market value (€10.0M vs €2.5M). Adam Markhiev leads in shots / 90 and key passes / 90. Mathis Amougou is stronger in passes (final 3rd) / 90 and tackles won / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Adam Markhiev has a market value of €2.5M, while Mathis Amougou is valued at €10.0M.