RisingTransfers

Abraham Marcus vs Gyan de Regt

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Abraham Marcus leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Gyan de Regt is stronger in key passes / 90. Overall, Abraham Marcus holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Abraham Marcus

Attacker
Nigeria
N/A
26 years old
Forward
Full profile →
Player B

Gyan de Regt

Attacker
Netherlands
N/A
22 years old
Forward
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Abraham Marcus

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.19 assists/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.53 big chances/90).

Gyan de Regt

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.9 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.21 assists/90) and creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.52 big chances/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricAbraham MarcusGyan de RegtEdge
Goals / 900.180.10Abraham
Assists / 900.180.21
Shots / 901.561.40Abraham
Key passes / 901.591.85Gyan
Passes (final 3rd) / 903.232.41Abraham
Tackles won / 900.720.57Abraham
Press intensity / 902.201.48Abraham
Pass accuracy %77.8071.80Abraham

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Abraham Marcus or Gyan de Regt?

Abraham Marcus leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Gyan de Regt is stronger in key passes / 90. Overall, Abraham Marcus holds the statistical edge across 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Abraham Marcus has a market value of N/A, while Gyan de Regt is valued at N/A.

Explore More