RisingTransfers

Aleksandr Lomovitskiy vs Tiago Morais

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Tiago Morais commands a higher market value (€3.0M vs €1.5M). Aleksandr Lomovitskiy leads in key passes / 90 and pass accuracy %. Tiago Morais is stronger in shots / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Aleksandr Lomovitskiy

Attacker
Russia
€1.5M
28 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →
Player B

Tiago Morais

Attacker
Portugal
€3.0M
22 years old
Small Sample
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Aleksandr Lomovitskiy

A Forward. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.6 key passes/90).

Tiago Morais

A Forward. Note: this profile is based on 671 minutes of playing time this season.

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricAleksandr LomovitskiyTiago MoraisEdge
Goals / 900.000.00
Assists / 900.000.00
Shots / 901.561.74Tiago
Key passes / 901.730.67Aleksandr
Passes (final 3rd) / 904.86
Tackles won / 900.97
Press intensity / 900.992.09Tiago
Pass accuracy %63.3054.80Aleksandr

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Aleksandr Lomovitskiy or Tiago Morais?

Tiago Morais commands a higher market value (€3.0M vs €1.5M). Aleksandr Lomovitskiy leads in key passes / 90 and pass accuracy %. Tiago Morais is stronger in shots / 90 and press intensity / 90. The two players are closely matched across most statistical dimensions.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Aleksandr Lomovitskiy has a market value of €1.5M, while Tiago Morais is valued at €3.0M.

Explore More