Andri Gudjohnsen vs Jørgen Strand Larsen
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Jørgen Strand Larsen commands a higher market value (€45.0M vs €2.9M). Andri Gudjohnsen leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Jørgen Strand Larsen is stronger in assists / 90 and tackles won / 90. Overall, Andri Gudjohnsen holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Target Man. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.0 key passes/90), a proven goalscorer (0.40 goals/90), strong in aerial duels (3.9 aerials won/90) and top 20% scorer in the league.
A Target Man.
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Andri Gudjohnsen | Jørgen Strand Larsen | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.40 | 0.06 | Andri |
| Assists / 90 | 0.00 | 0.06 | Jørgen |
| Shots / 90 | 1.72 | 1.35 | Andri |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.03 | 0.45 | Andri |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 3.51 | 2.05 | Andri |
| Tackles won / 90 | 0.00 | 0.13 | Jørgen |
| Press intensity / 90 | 1.39 | 0.51 | Andri |
| Pass accuracy % | 66.10 | 64.90 | Andri |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Andri Gudjohnsen or Jørgen Strand Larsen?
Jørgen Strand Larsen commands a higher market value (€45.0M vs €2.9M). Andri Gudjohnsen leads in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Jørgen Strand Larsen is stronger in assists / 90 and tackles won / 90. Overall, Andri Gudjohnsen holds the statistical edge across 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Andri Gudjohnsen has a market value of €2.9M, while Jørgen Strand Larsen is valued at €45.0M.