RisingTransfers

Achraf Dari vs Julius Dirksen

Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season

Data Verdict

Julius Dirksen is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Julius Dirksen holds the statistical edge across 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →

Player A

Achraf Dari

Defender
Morocco
€1.2M
27 years old
Aerial
Full profile →
Player B

Julius Dirksen

Defender
Netherlands
N/A
23 years old
Aerial
Full profile →

Playing Style Profiles

Achraf Dari

A Ball-Playing CB. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (5.3 clearances/90), meticulous in distribution (88% pass accuracy), wins the physical battle (67% duel success), dominant in the air (3.1 aerials won/90, 68%) and uses long balls frequently (6.2/90).

Julius Dirksen

A Physical Stopper. Statistically, he stands out as commanding in the air (6.8 clearances/90), wins the physical battle (66% duel success), blocks shots courageously (1.8 blocks/90), dominant in the air (3.0 aerials won/90, 65%) and uses long balls frequently (7.0/90).

Per-90 Statistics Comparison

MetricAchraf DariJulius DirksenEdge
Goals / 900.000.16Julius
Interceptions / 900.841.31Julius
Clearances / 904.196.70Julius
Press intensity / 901.231.76Julius
Pass accuracy %83.20

All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is the better player — Achraf Dari or Julius Dirksen?

Julius Dirksen is stronger in goals / 90 and interceptions / 90. Overall, Julius Dirksen holds the statistical edge across 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

How is this comparison calculated?

Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →

What are their market values?

Achraf Dari has a market value of €1.2M, while Julius Dirksen is valued at N/A.

Explore More