Atalay Babacan vs M. Nielsen
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Atalay Babacan leads in key passes / 90 and interceptions / 90. M. Nielsen is stronger in shots / 90. Overall, Atalay Babacan holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.1 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.17 assists/90), heavily involved in play (54 touches/90) and active off the ball (2.1 press score/90), contributing to defensive transitions.
A Balanced Midfielder. Statistically, he stands out as a capable chance creator (1.2 key passes/90), a reliable supplier (0.18 assists/90), a dynamic dribbler (2.4/90) and wins the physical battle (57% duel success).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Atalay Babacan | M. Nielsen | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.04 | 0.07 | — |
| Assists / 90 | 0.17 | 0.14 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 0.60 | 0.77 | M. |
| Key passes / 90 | 1.07 | 0.98 | Atalay |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | 5.05 | — | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | 1.01 | — | — |
| Interceptions / 90 | 0.60 | 0.42 | Atalay |
| Press intensity / 90 | 2.07 | 1.77 | Atalay |
| Pass accuracy % | 82.50 | 73.10 | Atalay |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Atalay Babacan or M. Nielsen?
Atalay Babacan leads in key passes / 90 and interceptions / 90. M. Nielsen is stronger in shots / 90. Overall, Atalay Babacan holds the statistical edge across 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Atalay Babacan has a market value of N/A, while M. Nielsen is valued at N/A.