Rachid Ghezza vs Eliesse Ben Seghir
Per-90 stats comparison · Rising Transfers DNA Analysis · 2025/26 season
Data Verdict
Eliesse Ben Seghir commands a higher market value (€24.0M vs €700K). Eliesse Ben Seghir is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Eliesse Ben Seghir holds the statistical edge across 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Based on per-90 statistics · How we compare players →
Playing Style Profiles
Rachid Ghezzal is a Link-up Striker. Deep-lying forward involved in build-up.
A Link-up Striker. Statistically, he stands out as an elite creator (1.7 key passes/90), a constant goal threat (3.1 shots/90), a regular goalscorer (0.31 goals/90), a reliable supplier (0.15 assists/90), creates high-quality scoring opportunities (0.93 big chances/90) and draws fouls effectively (2.9/90).
Per-90 Statistics Comparison
| Metric | Rachid Ghezza | Eliesse Ben Seghir | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals / 90 | 0.19 | 0.31 | Eliesse |
| Assists / 90 | 0.12 | 0.15 | — |
| Shots / 90 | 1.54 | 1.84 | Eliesse |
| Key passes / 90 | 2.22 | 2.30 | Eliesse |
| Passes (final 3rd) / 90 | — | 4.59 | — |
| Tackles won / 90 | — | 0.46 | — |
| Press intensity / 90 | 0.30 | 1.07 | Eliesse |
| Pass accuracy % | — | 85.70 | — |
All statistics per 90 minutes · 2025/26 season · FULL quality DNA data only
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the better player — Rachid Ghezza or Eliesse Ben Seghir?
Eliesse Ben Seghir commands a higher market value (€24.0M vs €700K). Eliesse Ben Seghir is stronger in goals / 90 and shots / 90. Overall, Eliesse Ben Seghir holds the statistical edge across 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
How is this comparison calculated?
Rising Transfers compares players using per-90 statistics normalised for playing time, combined with DNA playing style vectors built from 47 performance dimensions. This ensures fair comparison regardless of team, league, or playing time. Learn more about our comparison methodology →
What are their market values?
Rachid Ghezza has a market value of €700K, while Eliesse Ben Seghir is valued at €24.0M.